Talk:Angiostrongylus cantonensis

Animals Low‑importance

Angiostrongylus cantonensis is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Veterinary medicine Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veterinary medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicineTemplate:WikiProject Veterinary medicineVeterinary medicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Redirect

"Angiostrongylus cantonesis" only yields 465 Google hits; it offers "Angiostrongylus cantonensis" as a suggestion, which yields 33,000+ hits. Therefore, this seems to be a typo. This article has "cantonesis" in its title, but the fifth word is "cantonensis." Next: there is no article for Angiostrongylus cantonensis, but a number of articles link to Metastrongylidae with the text as cantonensis. Just some research. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 04:20, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I got help and had it moved with the previous spelling redirecting it here. This article needs a lot of clean up even as far as basic grammar. I suspect it was a cut-paste job and will need proper references. I received basic education in parasites years ago, but this is outside my specialty.--MartinezMD (talk) 16:52, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I oppose the proposed merge (the conditions are usually kept separate from the pathogens here) but I'd support moving most the clinical content to the angiostrongyliasis article. --Arcadian (talk) 00:31, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's a support for the merge, as that is the reason I added the tag. "Merge" does not mean redirect. The clinical content wasn't located in one section, so there was nowhere to add the merge tag except at the top. Since neither articles linked to each other, it seems that both authors were unaware of their respective pages, and most of the content was added to this page, hence the merge request. I previously commented on the WikiProject Medicine talk page. So, you are supporting my original request. Viriditas (talk) 03:07, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since the merge tag was so confusing, I'm changing it to {{Move portions}}. Viriditas (talk) 05:58, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I see the problem. You were responding to an old discussion from 2007 titled, "redirect". I've moved your response to a new section titled appropriately. I think we are both on the same page now. Viriditas (talk) 06:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the confusion. I agree now that our positions are the same. --Arcadian (talk) 06:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Angiostrongylus cantonensis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]